<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Posts on Maximilien Rothier Bautzer</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/</link><description>Recent content in Posts on Maximilien Rothier Bautzer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://maxbautzer.me/post/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The sink</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/the-sink/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxbautzer.me/post/the-sink/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s a little rectangular hole in our pockets through which time seems to pour through. Do you know how to plug it? I can’t seem to find a way.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;I will often sign grand contracts with myself to shut off the rectangle’s siren songs, to cast off its tyrannical shackles. Unfortunately, no amount of gnashing and trashing can fully rip out its hooks from my mind. Any respite is temporary, any hard earned freedom is soon lost to the rectangle’s weight.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Safe coding</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/safe-coding/</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxbautzer.me/post/safe-coding/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Testing is pretty uncontroversial these days, most people involved in software engineering will at least pay lip service to the idea that code should always be tested.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Although all tests are equal, some are more equal than others. Over the years I&amp;rsquo;ve come to think that the best tests share the same overarching design philosophy. I think working in a well tested codebase is truly an eye opening experience, it is radically different from working in the (more common) &amp;ldquo;hacked together with duct tape and prayers&amp;rdquo; kind of projects.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Software as a cost center</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/software-cost/</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxbautzer.me/post/software-cost/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;rsquo;s fair to say that most devs will cringe at their department being&#10;called &amp;ldquo;IT&amp;rdquo;. It evokes images of old fashioned big faceless corporations, as&#10;parodied in the show &amp;ldquo;The IT crowd&amp;rdquo;. Generally when someone uses the term &amp;ldquo;IT&amp;rdquo;,&#10;it betrays the paradigm through which they view developers: software as a cost&#10;center.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Developers in this model are a resources whose costs are to be carefully&#10;managed, they are solely here to keep the machines running, not decision makers&#10;or a core part of the business.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When your symphony plays itself</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/symphony/</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxbautzer.me/post/symphony/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been fascinated by a scene element found in Westworld, a TV show. At its&#10;core, the show is a rather classical story about humans losing control of the&#10;technology they created. It’s the age old tale of the perils of knowledge, meant&#10;to warn us against the dangers of technological progress. Most cultures and&#10;religions have similar stories, be it Icarus burning his wings as he flies too&#10;close to the sun or the builders of Babel’s tower being punished for getting too&#10;close to heaven.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The insolent red dot</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/insolent-red-dot/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxbautzer.me/post/insolent-red-dot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Like an arrow the little red plane pierced the clouds. He emerged on the other&#10;side, leaving behind him a trail of glittering droplets. The pilot smiled.&#10;Finally he was gazing upon the white fields of the world&amp;rsquo;s canopy. A feeling of&#10;peace overcame him, he finally felt unchained from the tiresome grip of the&#10;earth&amp;rsquo;s gravity. Here, above the clouds, the sky never darkened. It was either&#10;of the bluest blue or sprinkled with countless stars. Human matters faded away&#10;in this white desert. He was utterly, completely alone. And so he laughed in&#10;glee as the wind rushed around him.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The scientific framework is in dire need of an update</title><link>https://maxbautzer.me/post/the-scientific-framework/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://maxbautzer.me/post/the-scientific-framework/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For a discipline that prides itself on its ability to question the status quo,&#10;the way in which we do science has not changed much since the scientific&#10;revolution. This conservatism in methods has become so entrenched that it can&#10;start to feel unavoidable, and a whole ecosystem of self-interested parties has&#10;emerged to defend it. It feels almost transgressive to suggest that we can do&#10;better, to the point that I often feel like a madman when talking about the&#10;subject.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>